This piece of news about New York state's plans to wantonly waste the lives and bodies of 170,000 resident Canada geese infuriates me.
Following many months of discussions between the FAA, the Dept. of Agriculture and various state agencies, the goose population is being deliberately reduced in order to prevent the plane crashes that can result from the geese being sucked into the engines. I'm ok with this and such an effort is past due. These large populations of resident geese do not behave and migrate the way that their species traditionally has and they are out of synch with the environments that they find themselves in. In some areas of the US, they are arguably an invasive species.
What I'm not ok with is the way that they are planning to do this. Quoth the New York Times:
“The captured geese are placed alive in commercial turkey crates. The geese would be brought to a secure location and euthanized with methods approved by the American Veterinary Medical Association. Euthanized geese would be buried.”
If a hunter like myself engaged in this behavior, I would (justly) be prosecuted for
wanton waste. All 50 states, including New York, have laws against wanton waste. The point of such laws is to ensure that birds and animals are not killed in waste and that they are used as food or for some other legitimate purpose.
New York's statute is less restrictive than that of some other states but I think that it makes the point well.
This is the wrong way of doing it. Poisoning the geese to death by gas or injection and burying the corpses is a despicable and unethical waste of food. I think that it is also unnecessary. Hunters could be taking far more Canada geese if New York would change their hunting regulations into a body of law focused on hunting geese rather than playing a game.
I suggest that they do the following:
1. Eliminate the 3 shell capacity limit for shotguns used to hunt Canada geese. Federal regulations now allow states to do this.
2. Allow the use of electronic calls. Again, federal regulations changed to allow states to do this.
3. Not only allow, but actively encourage geese to be hunted with archery equipment. Work with targeted municipalities around airports to create urban archery seasons for resident Canada geese.
4. Allow the use of bait.
5. Allow the use of nets in designated urban and suburban areas.
These regulations that I suggest changing are things that have added up to a game rather than a sensible regulatory framework for hunting. If a hunter chooses to limit herself to a particular weapon or tactic, so be it. But prohibiting these hunting tactics by law is not in the public interest and is not necessary to prevent over-harvest, given that harvest totals are already regulated by bag limits. None of these items are safety issues, either.
The government of New York can't be especially concerned with hunting ethics or fair chase of Canada geese, given the fact that they are going to round 170,000 of them up in order to gas and bury them. So how can they say, with a straight face, that hunters shouldn't be using nets, crossbows or electronic calls in order to eat the geese?
They should be using some of this budget instead to offer goose-hunting workshops to potential new hunters, complete with lessons on shotgunning and archery. There are legions of locavores in the state of New York who would jump on such an opportunity.
You will be hearing about this issue again and again over the next few years as the FAA and the DOA work to reduce goose populations near airports all over America. This is a broad enough issue that we need to find a more ethical way of reducing resident goose populations. Something that doesn't involve killing animals without at least having the decency to use them as food.