Thursday, May 10, 2012

Sasquatch Guns, Revisited

Copyright 2010 by Jackson Landers.
Since its suddenly cool to hunt for bigfoot again, I this that this is a good time to re-post an article I wrote some years ago about choosing the right rifle and cartridge combination for sasquatch. This was part of an intermittent series that I did here on choosing guns for various theoretical creatures. Bigfoot, zombies, etc. 

The zombie piece was way ahead of its time. For years, if you Googled 'zombie gun' my blog was the very first thing that popped up. Then zombies got cool and eventually even the big gun magazines copied the premise of my piece. An ammunition company even started packaging cartridges a la zombie. Maybe sasquatch hunting has finally arrived in the mainstream?


My new book, 'Eating Aliens,' includes a very brief possible sighting of a sasquatch in the wild swamps surrounding Lake Caddo, near Louisiana's border with Texas. I'm not saying that it was definitely bigfoot that I saw, but I kept my gun lowered so we'll never know for sure.


Hunting Sasquatch: The Right Rifle for the Job

In the spirit of the piece I wrote last year exploring the question of what kind of firearm would be ideal for use against hordes of zombies, I now turn my attention to the question of the ideal sasquatch rifle.

Let us first consider the physical characteristics and natural history of the creature. Sasquatch is said to stand between 7 and 10 feet tall at maturity. It is a large, hairy bipedal creature thought to be a primate, possibly a remnant population of an early hominid, such as Gigantopithecus blacki. Most credible reports of sasquatch sightings in North America indicate a creature that prefers forested habitat in the Pacific Northwest. Anecdotal evidence suggests an omnivore.

Sasquatch is typically shy and is unlikely to seek a direct encounter with humans in it's territory (although exceptions have occurred).

In consideration of the likely habits and range of an individual sasquatch, it seems probable that we are dealing with something not unlike a black bear. An omnivore of this size in the habitat of the Pacific Northwest would probably require a territory of 30-50 square miles. Seasonal variations in food sources will require movement throughout this large territory. The high caloric demands of such a large beast probably preclude the formation of year-round clans larger than that of a mother and her young, since the amount of available food in any one area will not always be large enough to support larger groups. This is consistent with typical sightings of a single sasquatch in the wild, with occasional glimpses of a pair. In this sense, the effect of habitat on the social behavior of sasquatch may be similar to that of the orangutan. The size of sasquatch's brain (extrapolated from the size of the head) would suggest a species that is capable of living in large social groups, given adequate habitat.

While it's shy behavior is similar to that of a whitetail deer, the sasquatch is much more difficult to pattern as a prey species. We can anticipate that hunting the sasquatch will involve the mental challenges of hunting big woods whitetails, the physical rigors of an elk hunt and the hazard to life and limb presented by the pursuit of the grizzly bear. In this sense, hunting the sasquatch could be called the ultimate North American hunting challenge.

This unusual combination of difficulties demands a rifle carefully considered for taking on sasquatch.

As in the consideration of any firearm used for hunting, it is best to first determine what cartridges would be well-suited to the quarry. Then we can figure out the best sort of rifle to be used to deliver that particular bullet to the target at the prescribed speed. Sasquatch is indeed big, but is most likely thin-skinned in the manner of a human or a lion. Despite it's enormous height, we are probably talking about an animal with a torso that is lesser in diameter than that of a grown bull elk. This tells me that we can dismiss outright the idea of needing any sort of African-style big bore cartridge. .375 H&H and everything above and beyond that would be overkill, involving unnecessary trade-offs of increased weight and diminished accuracy over longer ranges in favor of a level of energy that is simply not necessary.

I suggest that what we should really be looking at is elk cartridges. 30-'06 would probably represent the entry level. A fast .33 would be more to the point. Perhaps .338 Federal. The odds of needing the flat-shooting characteristics of the 7mm Remington Magnum are low in the sasquatch's forested habitat. But the foot pounds of energy delivered to the target are certainly there in spades and one never knows if the only shooting opportunity of the hunt could come across, say, a 400 yard clear-cut in a timber-managed state forest.

Many of the fast .30s would also fit the bill. .300 Winchester Magnum is the obvious one that comes to mind.

Clearly there are plenty of reasonable choices of cartridge out there for sasquatch. For purposes of this exercise, I'm going to go with .300 WSM. It allows us a shorter action than the full-length magnum and thus a lighter rifle. It's also a common enough chambering that in a pinch, ammunition can be bought at any far-flung store in North America that sells ammo. This is not to be dismissed on a hunt that will take one far from home.

Onward to the actual rifle. A bolt action is the first choice here. We want a working gun that can withstand all the weather and rain that the Northwest can throw at us in the course of a long hunt. Certainly a composite stock and stainless action. Remington's XCR (eXtreme Conditions Rifle) series of model 700 rifles comes to mind as an obvious off-the-shelf choice. The XCR has Remington's proprietary Trynite coating over a stainless barrel and action, which supposedly resists even salt-water immersion. I have an XCR in 30-'06 and I can attest to the fact that one can sit in the rain for hours without a trace of rust appearing. However, note that your scope base and rings are unlikely to have the same quality of protection and they can start to rust up on you even though the actual rifle is taking the beating without complaint.

Let's keep the barrel length short. Sasquatch is unlikely to stick to trails which you find convenient. Odds are pretty good that you'll be doing a lot of bushwacking on a sasquatch hunt and you don't want a barrel that gets hung up on every bit of brush above your head. with the rifle slung over your shoulder. 22 inches would probably be acceptable. 20 inches might be better, depending on how tall you are. The loss of velocity from cutting off that much barrel is typically negligible within 300 yards.

The question of weight in a rifle of this sort is a tricky one. Yes, is is possible to get a very lightweight XCR built. Every last fraction of an ounce of structurally unnecessary metal is machined away, even to the extent of hollowing out the knob at the end of the bolt handle. This is very tempting in a rifle that one will be carrying up and down mountains for days, possible weeks on end as one searches for sasquatch sign. However, for most shooters it is probably a bad idea with a rifle chambered for a magnum cartridge such as .300 WSM. That is rather a lot of recoil by most people's standards and making the rifle really lightweight will make that recoil even worse. Mass resists motion in a proportional manner, meaning that a lighter rifle will kick backwards more so than a heavier rifle. Most people cannot shoot a truly lightweight rifle in a magnum chambering with the sort of accuracy that a sasquatch hunt demands. Let's face it; if you so much as glimpse one during the course of your hunt, you are very lucky indeed. Hunter opportunity will be extremely low and there will be no second chances if you flub the shot.

The only wise weight-reduction measures for most people would be going with as short action as your cartridge can be stuffed into, a lightweight composite stock and a short, fluted barrel.

We don't have any idea as to how readily the sasquatch goes down when hit. Certainly there are many animals out there which can respond to hits in vital areas in a manner contrary to anything that anatomical science suggests should be possible. Cape buffalo have been known to charge and gore people to death after multiple shots straight to the heart. They're dead on their feet, but they're too angry to concede the point for a few minutes. Because of this big unknown, I think it's not a bad idea to be using a rifle with a detachable magazine and a spare in your pocket in case you find a furious, wounded sasquatch bearing down on your person. We just don't know if these things might require shot after shot once their temper has been raised. You don't want to be standing there fiddling with individual cartridges in that situation.

Remington does offer a 'DM' version of many of their 700s. It's also not too difficult to convert an existing 700 for the use of detachable 4 round magazines, although you will have to be sure to obtain a stock that accommodates this. My own 700 is a DM version and I can assure you that the detachable magazines are very easy to use, feel exactly the same as a hinged floor plate while shooting, and are securely enough attached that there is little to no chance of the thing dropping out at an inconvenient moment.

This is not a rifle to mount an inexpensive scope on. It's one thing to use something like a Pine Ridge or a Tasco on the rifle that you use to take whitetails for meat on your home turf. If the scope fogs up or fails, it's not that big a deal. It's a ruined afternoon, not the hunt of a lifetime. When you are 50 miles from the nearest road, 1,000 miles from home and following sasquatch sign for days on end and your scope suddenly fogs up, you'll be a heck of a lot madder at yourself for not having bought high-quality glass like a Swarovski, Zeiss or Leupold. Do look for something that offers exceptional brightness and light-gathering in low-light conditions, since by many accounts sasquatch is largely nocturnal and your best opportunities to shoot may come at dusk.

So here's what we're looking at: A Remington Model 700 XCR chambered for .300 WSM, with a fluted barrel of 20-22 inches and detachable magazines. I am not saying that this is 'the only sasquatch rifle.' Just that this is a particular set-up that answers the purpose. Certainly there are custom Weatherbys and Rugers and so on that would also do the job. Someone could probably even make the case for an all-weather Browning BLR.

Sasquatch is unquestionably the most challenging prey in all of North America. This is proven by the fact that nobody has ever managed to get one. If it doesn't exist at all, then that only makes the task all the more difficult. If you should decide to join the hunt for this mysterious beast in an extremely politically incorrect way, don't just grab your whitetail gun and assume that it's going to do the trick. Look for a rifle that will be the right tool for the job.

[Photo copyright 2010 by Jackson Landers. This depicts a custom Mauser in .35 Whelen that I built with Paul Fritz. While it isn't the same gun I describe in this piece, I think it would do the job on bigfoot very nicely.]

Monday, May 07, 2012

Kids Fishing Rods: What Not to Buy

Going fishing is among the least expensive forms of entertainment (and food) available to us. In most states you can get a fishing license for around $15 or less. $35 worth of tackle can keep you busy and catching fish all summer. Most people end up spending more money than that for one night at the movies. $50 spent on the fishing basics keeps you fishing all year long.

You can spend very little money on a fishing rod and reel and still have a good time with it. But there is a limit. Particularly with regard to children's fishing rods. The bottom of the line has gotten so bad as to often be completely unusable. Its the plastic closed-reel rigs that are the problem.

The simplest rule of thumb is this: if the package involves a cartoon character, don't buy it.

These closed reel systems weren't too bad when I was a kid. I had a series of Zebco 202 type rigs that did all right. In fact, I still have one of them. The shells were plastic but the gears inside were all metal. They worked right out of the box and lasted for a few summers. I caught a lot of sunfish on those old Zebcos.
"If the package involves a cartoon character, don't buy it."
Today, a lot more of those parts are plastic. The big thumb button in the middle is usually pretty flimsy. I bought a bunch of these cheap models for my kids and some of them (including this Barbie-branded model by Shakespeare) were broken right out of the box and couldn't throw a single cast.

Frustrated by the quality of every closed-reel rig that we tested, I eventually put both of my kids on conventional spinning rods. It turns out, at least anecdotally, that a kid can learn to use an open reel spin rod just as easily as a closed-reel. Both my son and my daughter could cast a spinning rod by the age of four.

I'd like to see some more and better open-reel spinning rod and reel combos produced and marketed for children. A scaled-down reel with a smaller gap between the bail and the grip of the rod so that tiny fingers can more easily hold the line tight.

The closest thing that I have found and tested with my kids is this Mitchell Outback combo for only $20. The rod is too long for a lot of kids, though. I suggest removing the tiny reel from the Mitchell and attaching it to the smallest Ugly Stik you can find.

Rods sporting decals of Spongebob or Barbie probably catch the eyes of more kids in the aisles. But I believe that retailers are better off in the long run if they refuse to sell low-quality junk for beginners. The cartoon rigs are a $15 sale and then probably nothing more. A kid who is asked to use equipment that doesn't work very well won't be as interested in going fishing again. Retailers are better off selling something for a few dollars more than actually works. Fewer frustrations with equipment and more fish being caught are more likely to result in kids that keep buying fishing tackle for the rest of their lives.


[Photo copyright 2012 by Jackson Landers. Ok, I realize that I have used this same photo for at least two other blog entries. Sorry for repeating myself. But it illustrates my point nicely. This photo shows my 8 year old daughter in front of a catfish that she caught on the rig you see her holding. That is the Mitchell reel on an old Shakespeare EZ Cast rod.]

Saturday, May 05, 2012

On Ted Nugent

I haven't written as much lately as I used to about guns or about gun politics. I know that I have a lot of readers who started reading this blog because of those articles and I promise each of you that there will be more practical firearm stuff coming here in the future. But meanwhile I want to weigh in on the various news recently about Ted Nugent saying provocative things.

Ted Nugent and I have never met. If you went, line by line, down a list of prominent political issues then I think that he and I would disagree on a lot more than we would agree on. He and I both write and talk about hunting from very different angles. But I don't want to define myself that way and I don't want to define my relationships with other people that way.

Politics is not who we are. Here in the US I think that we get too caught up in our differences to recognize how very much we have in common even with those from what seems like the opposite end of the political spectrum. We're all still Americans.

Ted Nugent is not running for public office. He is not in a position of power. Nor do I believe that he substantially influences the opinions of very many people who don't already agree with him. He's this guy who plays guitar really well and he had some hits in the 70's and 80's and he said some stuff about guns and hunting some years ago and then the media suddenly wanted to put a mic in front of him constantly.

How well would most of you fare if someone put a microphone in front of you each and every day and asked you for your opinion on everything under the sun no matter what mood you were in? How long would it be until you said something stupid that made everyone hate you?

Most of us would look pretty bad, sooner or later. After years and years of being asked to opine on everything imaginable, Nugent said a bunch of dumb stuff about a bunch of people over the last month or two. Ok, well I personally would probably have bombed a lot sooner than that.

He's a human being. If we could divine each and every thing that any random person thinks or says all day long, all year long, we could find a reason to hate everyone if that was what we were after. But I think its better not to judge people at their worst. Lets stop looking for reasons to hate people. We should start looking for reasons to forgive people.

We don't need to agree with everything that someone thinks to be ok with them. I bet that if Ted Nugent and I went hunting or fishing together then we would get along just fine. It doesn't matter that we disagree on climate change and Barack Obama and a million other things. The world is bigger than that. You and I don't need to feel threatened by the things that we disagree with Ted Nugent about. The man volunteers to help kids with cancer and he loves his family and he likes dogs and he isn't an immediate threat to any of us. He isn't running for public office.

Yes, I disagree with the stupid things that Ted Nugent has said lately. But I also disagree with the idea that I'm supposed to hate him for it. He's a regular guy who has been put in an extraordinary situation.

Forgive.

[Photograph copyright 2012 by Jackson Landers. Pic related. Judge others as though you were sitting around a campfire with them at the end of a long day together.]

Wednesday, May 02, 2012

Caption Contest!

I have no idea how this guy got up there, but there he was along a dyke in Back Bay Wildlife Refuge. I snapped a few pictures of him on my way back from hiking to Corolla, NC from Virginia Beach.

This picture is begging for a really good caption.

The winner will receive their choice of either a signed copy of 'The Beginners Guide to Hunting Deer for Food', or an evening of catfishing with me along the James River here in Albemarle County, Virginia.

The contest ends in one week, on May 8th.


[Photo copyright 2012 by Jackson Landers]

Tuesday, May 01, 2012

A Very Long Walk on the Beach

What a week. Last Thursday I was giving a presentation on invasive species at the State Department. The next morning I woke up in DC, traded my necktie and oxfords for a hoodie and aqua socks and drove straight to a city park in Virginia Beach and started hiking south on a 22 mile journey to the Outer Banks. That night I fell asleep in my tent on the beach.

Long story short, I made it to Corolla. I had a really good time for a few days and then made the hard hike home. I can honestly say that I would recommend this trip to other people, though they should go armed with some advice on how to do this with the least amount of hassle. A short article about the trip will run in the next issue of Blue Ridge Outdoors and then I'm hoping to sell a longer article to another magazine.

Meanwhile, here's a photo from the trip down a particularly deserted stretch of beach. When I first saw the sea turtle laying on the beach I thought it was just resting or perhaps getting ready to lay some eggs. Once I got closer I saw the back end of it -- most likely the work of a local bull shark. I'm pretty sure that this is a Kemp's ridley sea turtle, which is critically endangered. If any readers can correct or confirm my species ID then I would really appreciate it.

[Photo copyright 2012 by Jackson Landers.]

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Rested and pretty much over my illness of the last week, I'm about to take another shot at my mission to walk to the Outer Banks of North Carolina from Virginia Beach.

First I'm in Washington DC tonight ahead of a presentation on invasive species that I am scheduled to deliver at the State Department tomorrow afternoon. The State Department isn't the first arm of government that comes to mind when we think about work against invasive species, but State has an important role in negotiating cooperation with other countries in preventing the movement of invasive species.

Then early Friday morning I drive down to Virginia Beach to start my hike. I'm running out of time to meet my deadline for this piece -- its due by the last day of the month.

Then what? My new book proposal is just about finished, I've been approached yet again about doing a TV show, and I'm looking to line up more book signings and speaking appearances throughout the summer before the book tour for 'Eating Aliens' starts.

Right now its getting to be make-or-break time for my future in this line of work. If I can't get another good book deal, TV offer or something similar then I'm not sure how to keep paying the bills at the end of the summer. I've put an awful lot of time and work into building a career as a hunting instructor and as a public advocate for sustainable hunting. Hopefully this isn't going to be the end of the line. If there is any environmental non-profit out there that would like to start funding work against invasive species, I'm your guy.

[Photo copyright 2012 by Jackson Landers.]
Custom Search